Rollover image to zoom
Mynx Gabardine Dress Pants - Classic Fit, Pleated Front, Hidden Expandable Waistband
Sale $34.99 Original Price $65.00
Free Shipping on orders of $75 or more! Details
The softest dress pant you'll find - anywhere. Our Mynx Gabardine Dress Pants offer comfortable sophistication and care-free style. No-iron fabric and a permanent crease keep these slacks free of wrinkles and ready to wear any day.
- Classic fit
- Pleated front
- 100% Polyester
- Hidden expandable waistband
- No iron
- Permanent crease
- Machine washable
Mynx® is a registered trademark of Unifi, Inc.
Rated 4.5 out of 5 by 41 reviewers.
Rated 5 out of 5 by McCallum1 Mynx Gabardine Dress and Classic Fit, Pleated Pants I received my Mynx Gabardine Dress and Classic Fit, Pleated Front, Expandable Waist pants without any damages. The right colors, style and a comfortable fit. .I gave five stars for reliable shipping and fit. January 4, 2017
Rated 4 out of 5 by CasualMale Phenomenal quality for the money. Goes well with my most expensive clothing gear and accessories Unbelievably impressed with the product. I wear business casual/dressy wear 5 days of the week and on trips. The quality of the Pants allow easy comfort when sitting, walking or bending. The pants were about 1" of. I generally wear a 32L, but returned them for a 31L and they fit perfectly.... The return process was extremely painless and timely. This is a great starter for those who are building their wardrobe on a budget... Haggar out did itself..... November 28, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by Trumpeter You can take a nap in these pants and not a wrinkle results. The Haggar Mynx Gabardine Dress Pants, black, is rugged and looks good all through the day, for days at a time. Incredibly wrinkle proof, even if you decided to take a mid-day 1 hour nap. Reasonably priced, to say the least. They look dressy. November 27, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by rlowe6699 Extremely suprised and happy The pants I purchased fit like they were tailored to my build as well as the shirt..... perfect. November 25, 2016
Rated 2 out of 5 by peepp poor what I bought was not what I thought it was, when do i get my money refunded November 17, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by BAZZ The pants feel great while wearing. Very Comfortable. At this moment I wear them to work but will take them along when I travel. November 15, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by jwalenta I have 6 pair Only slacks I will ever buy. Super lightweight, come out of the dryer wrinkle free, and are the most comfortable slacks on the planet. You can wear them with a sport coat and tie, or tone it down a bit on casual Friday with a pair of Sebago boat shoes. Seriously...... I don't wear anything else M-F. They also make great summer shorts...... which is again the only shorts I will ever buy. October 22, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by RDG7 Good look, Fits Great Really nice slacks, great fit & look. Casual or Dressy can't miss. October 18, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by GreekGod excellent for my needs Perfect fit, classic fit, excellent material for sitting hours in planes or cars because it will not wrinkle. October 13, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by gary2016 Great pants, but sizing seems to be off I gave these 3 stars because their sizing was off even compared to older (5 years plus) Haggar slacks that I have. I'm a W32" x L30" in all of my brands of jeans and slacks (both new and old). I've put on a 6 or 7 lbs in the last several months, so I ordered 3 pairs of W33" x L30". The W33" fit snugly (especially for an expandable waist band). I expected them to be more loose. But no big deal. The real problem was the length. The 30" lengths were way off. Over one inch longer than a typical 30" length. All 3 pairs were probably more like a 32" length (guess). I compared them to a few pairs of my 30" length slacks just to be sure I wasn't imagining it. So I sent them back to try another size. Problem was they aren't stocking 33" x 29" or even 34" x 29" in these. That figures. I did end up ordering the eclo slacks in 34" x 29" and they fit and are great quality pants as well. At least their sizing seems to be consistent across different models (but still off). Weird. September 24, 2016